statement
by the artist
The
Photograph as magical object (1970)
A
photographer could be considered a kind of magician, a being possessed
- of
very special powers that enable him to control mysterious forces and
- energies
outside himself. The photographer's intensely heightened sense
- perception,
product of the brutal discipline of constantly seeing at 1/250th of
- a
second, unevenly evolves his visual faculties to an almost superhuman
- degree.
With these highly-developed instincts, he seems to be able to almost
- anticipate
the activities of his subjects and sometimes actually appears to
- cause
their occurrence by some mental will power of his own that projects
- outward,
making reality conform to his mentally-conceived image of it that he
- records
on film. Often his best photographs are taken in a trance-like state,
- where
there is an almost unspoken mystical communication between his
- subject
and himself, and action is directed through non-verbal gesture and
- psychic
transference. As a trained observer, he can foretell the potential
- movements
of his subjects and perhaps even by mental intimidation and
- expansion
actually causes them to happen. The photographer participates
- in
an almost ritual dance with the world, whereupon his own intense re-
- sponse
to its rhythrns corresponds to his being able to predict its predeter-
- mined
patterns.
The
photographic image itself has great magical possibilities. Like the cere-
- monial
mask, the ritual incantation, the protective amulet, or magical mandala,
- the
photograph has the potency of releasing in the viewer preconditioned
- reactions
that cause him to physically change or be mentally transformed.
- In
fact, because of our intense belief in the factual literalness of the photo-
- graph,
it can provoke even stronger reactions than other graphic media. A
- photograph
can more often »grab our guts« or arouse our sexual desires
- than
other art forms because of its purported realness, but it can also more
- subtly
stimulate unconscious responses that we are hardly aware of. The
- grotesque
or frightening image may stir forgotten animal instincts of primordial
- helplessness
and fear, reaching back to the basic insecurity of early man and
- our
own personal childhoods. Images of great peace and harmony have the
- curative
possibility of restoring tranquillity and balance to a disturbed soul or
- agitated
body. The photographic image which hints at the essential mystery
- of
growing things and the unknown qualities of life itself can make the viewer
- aware
of higher states of nature to which we are faintly sensitive. The ma-
- gical
photograph is simply one that attempts by its mere assertive presence
- to
go beyond the immediate context of the recorded experience into realms
- of
the undefinable. The photographer as magician is just someone who is
- more
acutely aware of the subliminal »vibrations« of the evervday
world
- which
are wrapped up in our unconscious selves. He is, himself, totally
- »opened«
to the multiplicities of associations that are submerged behind the
- appearances
of the objective world. He uses the repressed mythology of
- dreams
and the archetvpal designs of geometry to conjure up deep and
- irrational
reactions from the viewer.
Perhaps
why so much of today's photography doesn't »grab us« or mean
- anything
to our personal lives is that it fails to touch upon the hidden life of
- the
imagination and fantasy which is hungry for stimulation. The documentary
- photographer
supplies us with facts or drowns in humanitv, while the picto-
- rialist,
avantgarde or conservative, pleases us with mere aesthetically cor-
- rect
compositions - but where are the photographs we can pray to, that
- will
make us well again, or scare the hell out of us? Most of mankind's art
- for
the past 5,000 years was created for just these purposes. lt seems ab-
- surd
to stop now.
Return